Project_NamePerformance of On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems and their Effects on Groundwater Quality
TAC LocationMontana
Project Date1/1/1998 12:00:00 AM
DescriptionRural and suburban residents, and small communities, depend on groundwater for their drinking water. Many of those communities also dispose wastewater to the shallow groundwater via on-site systems. With increasing rural subdivision, there is widespread concern for the possible contamination of drinking water by partially-treated wastewater. Nitrate-nitrogen is of particular concern. There are many "alternative" or "innovative" or "experimental" on-site systems in use. Each is designed to address a particular problem - a site constraint or wastewater constituent - that is not handled well by conventional septic systems. This project monitored three such systems. Its objectives were: 1) to document their effectiveness in treating domestic wastewater (particularly the alteration or removal of nitrogen), and 2) to define the minimum necessary sampling regime to accurately characterize treated wastewater and system performmance. A new, state-of-the-art intermittent sand filter serving a single-family home was monitored intensely for nine months. This filter, dosed at the rate prescribed by state regulations, cleansed the wastewater effectively of coliform bacteria and organic matter. Its total nitrogen removal ranged from 15% to 30%. Nearly all of its effluentnitrogen was in the form of nitrate. Clearly, a lightly-loaded sand filter does not provide the conditions for biological denitrification, and total nitrogen removal. The second system tested was a proprietary device, a recirculating trickling filter affixed to a septic tank. This system suffered from a number of mishaps. At its best, it provided 90% organic carbon removal and 75% total nitrogen removal ó the maximum possible with its 3:1 recycle ratio. This was achieved during only one of ten sampling periods. An aerated ìpackage plantî made by Cromaglass was studied over a 9-month period. Its initial performance, when few houses were connected, was poor. Thereafter, coliform removal averaged 90-99%, organic carbon removal exceeded 80%, and total nitrogen removal exceeded 70 %. This study involved sampling on 10 consecutive days at a time. The results were subjected to an analysis of variance, which showed that most variability occurred within sampling periods, not between them. The results reveal the inadequacy of quarterly grab samples often used by regulatory authority to characterize wastewater. Instead, the investigators recommend optimizing resources - if budget allows sampling eight times per year, for example, these samples should be in two or three clusters rather than spread out to one every six or seven weeks.
CategoryTechnology
Media TypePDF
ContactGretchen Rupp
Contact Phone(406)994-6690
Emailgrupp@montana.edu
Project URL watercenter.montana.edu/pdfs/ground-wql.pdf